Current:Home > ScamsTrump’s lawyers tell an appeals court that federal prosecutors are trying to rush his election case -消息
Trump’s lawyers tell an appeals court that federal prosecutors are trying to rush his election case
View
Date:2025-04-18 21:02:58
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawyers for Donald Trump told a federal appeals court on Wednesday that it should not speed up its consideration of whether the former president is immune from prosecution, accusing federal prosecutors of trying to rush his 2020 election subversion case through before next year’s presidential election.
“The prosecution has one goal in this case: To unlawfully attempt to try, convict, and sentence President Trump before an election in which he is likely to defeat President Biden,” defense lawyers wrote Wednesday. “This represents a blatant attempt to interfere with the 2024 presidential election and to disenfranchise the tens of millions of voters who support President Trump’s candidacy.”
The issue is of paramount significance to both sides given the potential for a protracted appeal to delay a trial beyond its currently scheduled start date of March 4. Trump faces charges he plotted to overturn the 2020 election after he lost to Democrat Joe Biden, and he has denied doing anything wrong.
Trump’s legal team had appealed a trial judge’s rejection of arguments that he was protected from prosecution for actions he took as president. But special counsel Jack Smith sought to short-circuit that process by asking the Supreme Court on Monday to take up the issue during its current term, a request he acknowledged was “extraordinary” but one he said he was essential to keep the case on track.
Smith’s team simultaneously asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to expedite its consideration of Trump’s appeal, writing: “The public has a strong interest in this case proceeding to trial in a timely manner. The trial cannot proceed, however, before resolution of the defendant’s interlocutory appeal.”
The Supreme Court has indicated that it would decide quickly whether to hear the case, ordering Trump’s lawyers to respond by Dec. 20. The court’s brief order did not signal what it ultimately would do.
A Supreme Court case usually lasts several months, from the time the justices agree to hear it until a final decision. Smith is asking the court to move with unusual, but not unprecedented, speed.
Nearly 50 years ago, the justices acted within two months of being asked to force President Richard Nixon to turn over Oval Office recordings in the Watergate scandal. The tapes were then used later in 1974 in the corruption prosecutions of Nixon’s former aides.
It took the high court just a few days to effectively decide the 2000 presidential election for Republican George W. Bush over Democrat Al Gore.
If the justices decline to step in at this point, Trump’s appeal would continue at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Smith said even a rapid appellate decision might not get to the Supreme Court in time for review and final word before the court’s traditional summer break.
veryGood! (81884)
Related
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- A step-by-step guide to finding a therapist
- Oil Pipelines or Climate Action? Trudeau Walks a Political Tightrope in Canada
- Best Memorial Day 2023 Home Deals: Dyson, Vitamix, Le Creuset, Sealy, iRobot, Pottery Barn, and More
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Charities say Taliban intimidation diverts aid to Taliban members and causes
- Best Memorial Day 2023 Home Deals: Dyson, Vitamix, Le Creuset, Sealy, iRobot, Pottery Barn, and More
- Arizona GOP election official files defamation suit against Kari Lake
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Keep Up With Khloé Kardashian's Style and Shop 70% Off Good American Deals This Memorial Day Weekend
Ranking
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Intermittent fasting is as effective as counting calories, new study finds
- Tourist subs aren't tightly regulated. Here's why.
- Helping the Snow Gods: Cloud Seeding Grows as Weapon Against Global Warming
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Canada Sets Methane Reduction Targets for Oil and Gas, but Alberta Has Its Own Plans
- In Cities v. Fossil Fuels, Exxon’s Allies Want the Accusers Investigated
- Shop the Best lululemon Deals During Memorial Day Weekend: $39 Sports Bras, $29 Tops & More on Sale
Recommendation
California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
Massachusetts’ Ambitious Clean Energy Bill Jolts Offshore Wind Prospects
It's never too late to explore your gender identity. Here's how to start
A smarter way to use sunscreen
Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
Cyberattacks on hospitals 'should be considered a regional disaster,' researchers find
3 San Antonio police officers charged with murder after fatal shooting
Here's your chance to buy Princess Leia's dress, Harry Potter's cloak and the Batpod