Current:Home > InvestFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -消息
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-21 11:14:06
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (4639)
Related
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- 2 horses die less than 24 hours apart at Belmont Park
- Brain Scientists Are Tripping Out Over Psychedelics
- In Pennsylvania, One Senate Seat With Big Climate Implications
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $280 Crossbody Bag for Just $59
- Mass. Court Bans Electricity Rate Hikes to Fund Gas Pipeline Projects
- After a Rough Year, Farmers and Congress Are Talking About Climate Solutions
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Transcript: New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu on Face the Nation, June 11, 2023
Ranking
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Psychedelic drugs may launch a new era in psychiatric treatment, brain scientists say
- Maternal deaths in the U.S. are staggeringly common. Personal nurses could help
- Lily-Rose Depp Confirms Months-Long Romance With Crush 070 Shake
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Pennsylvania Ruling on Eminent Domain Puts Contentious Pipeline Project on Alert
- The Pope has revealed he has a resignation note to use if his health impedes his work
- Cyberattacks on hospitals thwart India's push to digitize health care
Recommendation
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Revolve's 65% Off Sale Has $212 Dresses for $34, $15 Tops & More Trendy Summer Looks
Children's hospitals are struggling to cope with a surge of respiratory illness
Psychedelic drugs may launch a new era in psychiatric treatment, brain scientists say
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
A new kind of blood test can screen for many cancers — as some pregnant people learn
Florida Supreme Court reprimands judge for conduct during Parkland school shooting trial
Perceiving without seeing: How light resets your internal clock