Current:Home > StocksWest Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies -消息
West Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies
View
Date:2025-04-12 12:04:28
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — West Virginia lawmakers on Thursday soundly rejected a bill that would have expanded a law enforcement database to include collecting DNA samples from people arrested for certain felonies.
Some legislators cited privacy concerns during a lengthy debate before the 66-30 vote by the Republican-dominated House of Delegates. Three members were absent.
“This is just another step away from our liberties,” said Republican Del. Rolland Jennings of Preston County.
Current state law requires a DNA sample to be taken from anyone convicted of a felony and certain misdemeanors. The bill would have expanded the law to obtain DNA through cheek swabs from adults arrested on felony charges of violence against someone, a burglary or a case involving a minor. The samples would be sent to a state crime lab and the results stored in an FBI database.
“If you don’t want your DNA taken, don’t do a heinous crime,” said Republican Del. Scot Heckert, a bill supporter.
But some Democrats were concerned about the bill’s potential infringement on Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
“This bill is extremely broad,” Ohio County Democrat Shawn Fluharty said. “It’s dangerous territory to put people in a DNA database simply because they’ve been arrested just for probable cause and accused of a crime.”
Mason County Republican Jonathan Pinson, a bill supporter, said it was no more of a constitutional concern than collecting fingerprints from suspects. Pinson said lawmakers should be more concerned about helping crime victims whose cases remain unsolved “because we don’t know where to look” for evidence.
The bill also contained steps to expunge someone’s DNA records from the database if they were cleared of the felony charges.
Prior to the vote, the House twice rejected bids to halt debate on the bill.
veryGood! (93)
Related
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Unexploded bombs found in 1942 wrecks of U.S. Navy ships off coast of Canada
- The FDIC says First Citizens Bank will acquire Silicon Valley Bank
- After the Wars in Iraq, ‘Everything Living is Dying’
- Trump's 'stop
- 6 people hit by car in D.C. hospital parking garage
- EPA Struggles to Track Methane Emissions From Landfills. Here’s Why It Matters
- Activists Target Public Relations Groups For Greenwashing Fossil Fuels
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Can Biden’s Plan to Boost Offshore Wind Spread West?
Ranking
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Maddie Ziegler Says Her Mom Apologized for Putting Her Through Dance Moms
- Inside Clean Energy: Yes, We Can Electrify Almost Everything. Here’s What That Looks Like.
- In clash with Bernie Sanders, Starbucks' Howard Schultz insists he's no union buster
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Inside Clean Energy: Ohio’s EV Truck Savior Is Running Out of Juice
- AMC ditching plan to charge more for best movie theater seats
- Judge rules Fox hosts' claims about Dominion were false, says trial can proceed
Recommendation
Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
Saudis, other oil giants announce surprise production cuts
A New Hampshire beauty school student was found dead in 1981. Her killer has finally been identified.
Deadly ‘Smoke Waves’ From Wildfires Set to Soar
Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
ConocoPhillips’ Plan for Extracting Half-a-Billion Barrels of Crude in Alaska’s Fragile Arctic Presents a Defining Moment for Joe Biden
Inside Clean Energy: Arizona’s Energy Plan Unravels
Meet The Flex-N-Fly Wellness Travel Essentials You'll Wonder How You Ever Lived Without